Thursday, June 25, 2009

How Do You Get A Pram In Sims 2



CENSORSHIP
BRAZEN THE POPULAR RESPONSE DID NOT EXPECT


vergonsoza Rejection censorship of the magazine Directions. The decision not to distribute the magazine on June 7 in San Juan generated rejection and that yesterday was a demonstration and a hoot to repudiate the fact. "Enough of censorship," "Defend Water and Glaciers" were some of the banners of the demonstrators who defied the Code Misdemeanor punishable by treacherously Gioja restricting demonstrations opposing social and samples.

Source: The Journal
Andes San Juan, Argentina - 20/06/1909. About 200 San Juan claimed in the center of the neighboring province have freedom of expression.

The decision not to distribute the magazine Directions on June 7 in San Juan generated rejection and that yesterday was a demonstration and a hoot to repudiate the fact.

The protesters complained that there was censorship by not allowing readers of the newspaper Los Andes Diario de Cuyo and agree to the publication that Sunday was focused on mining.

concentration was in the center, where about 200 people complained to signs pointing to defend freedom of expression.

That day in San Juan, Directions magazine was removed from the edition of the newspaper Los Andes, and no one yet has claimed responsibility, while the daily San Juan decided to withdraw for reasons editorialese. The demonstrators, who included university students, environmentalists and community leaders, ensured that the province frequently has problems with any publication that make mention critical to mining.

"do not let us inform us accordingly. This is against censorship and for freedom of expression. It's very suspicious that the magazine is gone," said Grace, one of the demonstrators, while calling for motorists to touch horn. Similarly

sense, the Argentine Journalism Forum (Fopea) said through a statement, its concern "about this restriction on the movement of the number of Directions Magazine cover story which was precisely one of the controversial issues in the province San Juan, which could have constituted an act of censorship. "

The call for protest yesterday came at Facebook and text messages. "When I saw what happened with the magazine I came to propose something on Facebook and I had much response. In San Juan there is no freedom of expression, anyone who believes differently has a voice," said Carlos Bianchi, a political science student. The protest was

quiet. First, the protesters gathered in front of Diario de Cuyo, Mendoza on street, and the common message was the suspicion that there is a pact between the government of José Luis Gioja and most of the media for "anyone to speak against the mining." Therefore

recalled that San Juan was cut some TV TN city as Ecology and La Liga when issued reports on the subject. "Our idea is to create citizens' actions within the framework of law and respect. We came to ask why the magazine came out and gave us mixed messages. The censorship came by government order," said Francisco Cevallos, a history professor and member of the Union Citizens Assemblies.

A journalist from Los Andes requested the opinion of the Diario de Cuyo after the protest, but since the newspaper was sent to the publisher released a few days in asserting that he did not distribute the magazine because he understood that the note on mining was incorrect. From the Executive Branch of San Juan, meanwhile, claimed not be aware of the protest. They also said that the problem is outside the government. "

Salt In Shampoo Pranks






MEGAMINERIA AND POLICY IN SAN JUAN, better not talk about certain things ...

June 7, 1811, died Mariano Moreno. He had founded La Gaceta de Buenos Aires, the first paper Argentina. establishing that date as the day of the journalist. Interestingly censored it, they sent a boat and was poisoned. 98 years later, on Saturday June 6 in San Juan, Diario de Cuyo not released the preview of Directions magazine, as you used to. Sunday 7, the day arrived without the magazine. Counterpoint by contributors in San Juan.

the absence of any explanation for the absence in the same journal, many newsboys were puteados. Several hypotheses emerged.
From word of mouth, people flocked to the Internet. Sought and found in different sites, social networks, forums and chain mail note kidnapped magazine cover: "Mining in Question" Written by Jackie Isola.
http://www.diariolibre.info/secciones/noticias/nota.php?id=8841
It became clear that business interests outweighed the newspaper that the rights of readers. The medium receives substantial prominera pattern (you pay Barrick, Gualcamayo and chambers of mining suppliers.) It also has official guidelines. As is known, for mining Gioja government is state policy. And this is crystallized in the supplement "Whose Mining" which is published weekly.

In a state of law, people have freedom of thought and expression, as enshrined in the Pan American Convention of Human Rights. In this sense, it can not be questioned to half its editorial stance. But the abduction issue No. 302 of course was an attack on the "right of everyone to seek, seek, receive and impart information, opinions and ideas," as article 13 of the Pact of San José de Costa Rica. We tried to Giles. And what's worse, underestimated the critical ability of readers and exchange information to investigate alternatives. Or we can think that in the paper are blinded by power, belong to one of the strongest groups ecnómicos our provincial (have the largest daily newspaper in San Juan and the highest-rated radio stations, among other businesses). This blindness (or naivety) made until Wednesday hubiera una explicación por parte del medio sobre la censura de la revista. Quizá pesó en esta decisión el hecho de que la desaparición tuvo repercusión en otros medios y otras provincias. Incluso, Mirtha Legrand le preguntó el martes a Gioja por la revista censurada y el gobernador se desvinculó del hecho, sugiriendo que “habrá que preguntarle al diario”.

Librado a su suerte, el miércoles 10, Diario de Cuyo publicó una editorial: “Por qué no salió la revista Rumbos el domingo”. Argumentan que, en defensa de los sanjuaninos, decidieron no sacar la revista. Otra vez nos tratan de estúpidos, enmascarándose en la (inexistente) objetividad periodística.
http://www.diariodecuyo.com.ar/home/new_noticia.php?noticia_id=346784
Despite 26 years of uninterrupted democracy, dictatorial practices are repeated, albeit more subtle. But there are new from the ground up: in the counter-mobilization of public opinion, had to go for a reply within 3 days instead of 30 years.

Correspondents / contributors of Counterpoint in San Juan.

COUNTERPOINT by various public protests and reporting their plight to the pedestrian population of San Juan. They This has a city ordinance that prohibits "street", which makes some exceptions for activities such as selling juice, tea, sugared, shoe shine, but silent before the craft, despite the existence of provincial law for the protection of handicrafts, 6984 law, which recognizes, promotes and protects the craft. In November last year to the mobilization of artisans, the capital deliberative council approved an ordinance to adhere to the provincial law and including the exceptions to the craft and empowers the executive to regulate it. Using this authority, the executive tries to bring artisans from the pedestrian and take them elsewhere. Limiting his public activity to some lost corner of the San Juan center, away from commercial activity.
municipal inspectors have seized merchandise and tools many craftsmen, which were never returned, and suffer from constant threats and of course the inability to exercise their profession freely. The profession of craftsmanship @ is a cultural activity, creative, autonomous and self-managed, perhaps from the state that l @ s suppressed, trying to hide and get rid of, they are a worthy example for those who do not want to depend on an employer, or the perks of larger pattern is the state. for the free use of public spaces and the right to create!